A selection of other electric vertical-takeoff and landing aircraft :
![](https://agileaircraft.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Archer-two-seater-side-1024x547.jpg)
![](https://agileaircraft.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Electra.aero_-1024x494.png)
![](https://agileaircraft.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/AMSL_Vertiia-1024x589.png)
![](https://agileaircraft.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Airspeeder.jpeg)
![](https://agileaircraft.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/EHang-216-1024x512.jpg)
![](https://agileaircraft.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Jetson-1-1024x640.jpg)
![](https://agileaircraft.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Opener-Blackfly.jpg)
![](https://agileaircraft.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Tetra-Mk-5-1024x621.jpg)
![](https://agileaircraft.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Air-One-1024x670.jpg)
![](https://agileaircraft.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/lilium-into-new-york.jpg)
Comparison by lift/power
– estimated from disk-loading (pressure difference across rotor)
![](https://agileaircraft.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/VTOL_LiftPerKw.png)
The lilium is clearly inefficient in hover, but their strategy (see lilium blog) assumes “limited time period spent in the power-hungry hover mode” and instead optimises for “efficient cruise flight” and “low noise”.
However negotiating obstacles, to meet objective 1, requires significant time in hover and low-speed flight, and high power would require expensive batteries and non-standard electrical components that are incompatible with the objective of an affordable vehicle.
![](https://agileaircraft.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/image-8.png)